Trans issues and/or fairness in sports

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
edited August 2024 in Epiphanies
I was watching the Olympics and thinking about trans inclusion issues. I'd be interested to hear some trans voices on these, @gwai posted one on the other thread: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/12/opinion/transgender-sports-science.html

There's no point in having a mind if you never change it, as they say. Generally speaking I've avoided these discussions as they seem to inevitably end up in the same positions.

Recently I've been thinking that the discussions tend to start in the wrong place. I think they undervalue the evolving nature of sports, the way that things change. There's no guarantee that Olympic sports will remain in the current format indefinitely.

Secondly, I've been increasingly aware that there are sports which will be increasingly difficult to justify in the future as they are leading to head injury and brain injury/disease. If these somehow migrate to being eSports then the physical attributes of individuals could be less important in the future whilst also being considerably safer.

Third there's the whole issue of body image and objectification.

Finally I've been thinking for a while that as a spectacle it is slightly odd that in some sports (swimming, sprinting) audiences want to see the very biggest and best, whilst in others (boxing, parasports) there's more of a concept that fairness means some effort to ensure competitors meet people of similar size. I'm not convinced that there couldn't be competitive and exciting all-gender track&field athletics if the competitors were arranged by size/weight (or perhaps even something like bicep size).

Comments

  • This other link offered by @Gwai is particularly sad. https://www.self.com/story/trans-athletes-womens-sports-mental-health

    I can't see any real justification in gender separation in disc golf. And having seen BMX bikes at the Olympics, I don't think that would be a poorer competition if there were all genders involved.


  • DoublethinkDoublethink Admin, 8th Day Host
    edited August 2024
    If you watch the paralympics you will see international sport quite capable of generating complex category systems based on function - and crowds being entertained by sport in this way.

    It seems to me they should just ditch the gender binary all together, and class athletes using some formula combing height / percentage muscle mass and testosterone range. You could call the classes whatever you want - in the paralympics they use letter number codes - but it is not beyond the wit of man to devise something more catchy, a colour division for example. Your algorithm comes out as a you compete in yellow division, it comes out as b and you compete in purple division etc.
  • Here's another experience of an athlete:
    Noel thinks an exemption would have been useful when he did not feel ready to play with the men’s team yet. He wanted to keep going with the women’s team but was stopped due to his medical treatment with testosterone – a substance classified as doping. He highlighted: “It’s hard as hell to play with guys straight away, when your body hasn’t adjusted to the treatment and when you’ve played with girls and women all your life. I’ve tried to be as clear as possible with the basketball federation and the doping committee that I’m not here to win every game with the help of testosterone. I’m here to play because it facilitates my everyday life – and basketball helps me.”

    From this paper: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21640629.2021.1990656#d1e353
  • KendelKendel Shipmate
    edited August 2024
    National Public Radio (NPR) has been running a series called "Tested" on the air and as a podcast. I caught the episode "What is an Unfair Advantage" the other day, where the commentator talked about the wide variety of advantages that are part of every athlete's ability to compete in the Olympics, many of which are unfair in more important ways than gender. Various forms of wealth, for example. No one is worrying about those.
    If you watch the paralympics you will see international sport quite capable of generating complex category systems based on function - and crowds being entertained by sport in this way.

    It seems to me they should just ditch the gender binary all together, and class athletes using some formula combing height / percentage muscle mass and testosterone range. You could call the classes whatever you want - in the paralympics they use letter number codes - but it is not beyond the wit of man to devise something more catchy, a colour division for example. Your algorithm comes out as a you compete in yellow division, it comes out as b and you compete in purple division etc.

    Yes. This is a great example.
  • la vie en rougela vie en rouge Purgatory Host, Circus Host
    On his most recent podcast, Trevor Noah was discussing the (entirely unfair) furore around Imane Khelif. One interesting point that he made was that pretty much all elite athletes are biological outliers in some way or other. No one is telling Michael Phelps that he needs to make his arms shorter or change his lactic acidic tolerance.

    It was also noted that discussion around testosterone levels in female athletes always get particularly ugly when the athletes in question are women of colour.
  • In some parasports, teams have to include a specified number of players of different categories.

    It's easy to think of this as a problem, even a handicap. But I think it just requires some creativity and thought.

    I enjoyed the Olympics volleyball. It was clear that the men's game was faster and more aggressive, however there were some real skills and exciting games in the women's game. I can't honestly see that an Olympic volleyball game where it is specified that half the players on each side need to be a smaller size would make the games worse.

    I'm not a volleyball expert so I could well be proved wrong, I'm just trying to suggest that mixed gender games don't seem to me to be, philosophically, the problem that the Olympics seem to think it would be.
  • Also the Olympics seem to have a ripple-down effect on everything else. Sports that are in the Olympics, or even which want to be, have to follow the Olympic regulations on gender. Even when you are in a minor league which is never going to create an Olympian.
  • KoF wrote: »
    In some parasports, teams have to include a specified number of players of different categories.

    It's easy to think of this as a problem, even a handicap. But I think it just requires some creativity and thought.

    I enjoyed the Olympics volleyball. It was clear that the men's game was faster and more aggressive, however there were some real skills and exciting games in the women's game. I can't honestly see that an Olympic volleyball game where it is specified that half the players on each side need to be a smaller size would make the games worse.

    I'm not a volleyball expert so I could well be proved wrong, I'm just trying to suggest that mixed gender games don't seem to me to be, philosophically, the problem that the Olympics seem to think it would be.

    It's a netball/basketball variation, but korfball seems to do OK for itself, and has deliberately mixed teams.
  • GwaiGwai Epiphanies Host
    A very relevant topic for sure. Thanks for splitting this off, Kof. I know that for me I think we have to start for what is right for people. And that isn't just the trans people, but boy howdy it would be nice if we stopped ignoring trans people. I think the Michael Phelps comparison is extremely relevant and that's how I discussed the issue with my mother. I do care about the opinions of other competitors too. But let's be honest a real takeover of sports by trans people just isn't happening. And seriously no one is doing a full transition to win in sports. There are way easier ways to cheat.

    But the people most affected are not in the Olympics and 99.99% never will be. I mean all the trans kids who can't play sports without pretending to be a different gender. And these children don't even necessarily have the advantage of having gone through AMAB puberty. Many of them haven't gone through puberty at all! Half these children don't care about winning even. They just want to play with their friends. The worst crime is denying those children the chance to play.
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    I would venture that part of the problem is a sporting culture that extends victory uber alles right down to young children (or rather their parents). It's spreading in parts of the UK and I've heard horror stories from the US.
  • I would venture that part of the problem is a sporting culture that extends victory uber alles right down to young children (or rather their parents). It's spreading in parts of the UK and I've heard horror stories from the US.

    The behavior of aggressive parents at youth sports here in the US has been ghastly.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/newyork/news/youth-sports-leaders-alarmed-uptick-parents-aggressive-toward-referees-umpires/

    https://www.parents.com/do-parents-need-silencing-at-youth-sports-games-8303953

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2023/10/15/parent-behavior-in-youth-sports-is-abusive-officials-dont-feel-safe/71194511007/
  • Kendel wrote: »
    National Public Radio (NPR) has been running a series called "Tested" on the air and as a podcast. I caught the episode "What is an Unfair Advantage" the other day, where the commentator talked about the wide variety of advantages that are part of every athlete's ability to compete in the Olympics, many of which are unfair in more important ways than gender. Various forms of wealth, for example. No one is worrying about those.

    I've been listening to Tested as well - I really recommend it for anyone who's interested in these issues.

    One point they made in episode 1 or 2 is that it's exclusively female-presenting athletes who are checked for high testosterone. Nobody is demanding that participants in the men's sports get checked.

    This makes me think that the whole fuss is not really about unfair advantages at all - surely if high testosterone makes a big difference to athletic performance, the officials would care if a man had it too.
  • CaissaCaissa Shipmate
    The outcome of this investigation will be interesting.
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/boxing-complaint-1.7294151
  • I would venture that part of the problem is a sporting culture that extends victory uber alles right down to young children (or rather their parents). It's spreading in parts of the UK and I've heard horror stories from the US.

    The essence of most sports is that you try to out-compete your opposition. You are trying to run faster than them, or jump higher, or score more goals, or whatever.

    You're not out to have a nice afternoon running around in circles, or scoring points based on how much you exceed your previous registered personal best*.

    This doesn't mean that the competition has to be merciless and cut-throat, but competition is at the core of most sports, and even young children who aren't very good at whatever the sport is tend to be sensitive to whether a competition is fair.

    I can point you to a number of occasions - both from my own youth, and from things I've been involved with recently as an adult - where a school has deliberately fielded their B or C team in competition against other schools, because their A team would ridiculously outclass the opposition, and that seems all fine and sensible to me. That doesn't work in district / regional leagues or something like that, though.

    *You can do sports this way. Handicaps are perhaps most commonly used in golf, but they're easy enough in theory to apply to any sport where the competitors are mostly independent of each other. It's much more difficult to successfully handicap a soccer match, for example.
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    You're not out to have a nice afternoon running around in circles, or scoring points based on how much you exceed your previous registered personal best*.

    Speak for yourself. My sister-in-law plays hockey, and I've never heard her talk about the score or even about whether her team wins or loses. She loves playing hockey and she loves being in the company of the other women, whom she admires. She's dedicated to hockey practice, and they're all out there trying really hard and yes, competing, but it's really not at all about victory for her. It's about effort and teamwork and camaraderie.
  • And in some sports, like cross-country, PRing (setting a new personal record) can be just as important if not more important for an individual athlete than scoring points. A team may have 20+ runners, but only 5–7 can score points for a team.

  • EnochEnoch Shipmate
    @Leorning Cniht
    "For when the one great scorer comes,
    To write against your name,
    He writes not that you won or lost,
    But how you played the game"

    Inscribed on the grave of this man in Eyam churchyard in Derbyshire. There's a picture of the grave on the linked page.

Sign In or Register to comment.