But I have a near-religious taboo against using "The Streisand Effect", which has always sounded a little jarring to my ears, since it was coined in the 2000s, long after Streisand had ceased to be a culturally interesting figure, and now used mostly(I suspect) by people who don't really hold any perception of her heyday, just knew about her attempts to suppress the photos.
But that attempt to suppress the photos is what the Streisand Effect refers to. To the degree it might have anything to do with cultural interest, the overall lack of cultural interest, the fact that people wouldn’t otherwise be interested had she not made a big deal trying to hide it, is part of it.
Though make no mistake; for some of us, Barbra Streisand will always be of cultural interest.
Meidas is a fairly credible, if at times tiresomely partisan, source, but I don't know how they discovered this discrepancy, ie. if someone emailed it to them after the redaction had taken place(in which case, the supposed original could be a photoshop), or if one of their journalists discovered it on their own.
redacted
(ETA legal redactions, Dafyd Hell Host) (ETA formatting, DT Admin)
I'm afraid that I don't think that's sufficiently reliable for us to be comfortable republishing those allegations free from fear of litigation. We shall discuss the general principles backstage.
Comments
Though make no mistake; for some of us, Barbra Streisand will always be of cultural interest.
Now, now, some of them will be other Republican politicians or business leaders who are pro-Trump.
Meidas is a fairly credible, if at times tiresomely partisan, source, but I don't know how they discovered this discrepancy, ie. if someone emailed it to them after the redaction had taken place(in which case, the supposed original could be a photoshop), or if one of their journalists discovered it on their own.
redacted
(ETA legal redactions, Dafyd Hell Host)
(ETA formatting, DT Admin)
Doublethink, Admin