Heaven: Nerdish Railways - for those in favour of the Iron Horse

Wesley JWesley J Circus Host
edited January 2023 in Limbo
As suggested by Lots of Yay here, it is probably time again for another railway appreciation thread, and which is more heavenly that hellish.

For starters, I am copying one of my own one of my own posts:
Fair enough, but now I'm stuck on the Grosmont to Pickering Route Learning on the NYMR (North Yorkshire Moors Railway) video, which goes on for nearly 2 hours, and I've actually got other things to do! Grrrr.

ETA: They nearly flattened a ewe and two lambs early in that ran over the track, just a mere few yards ahead of the train!

This is fascinating and quite meditative, although I wonder why they don't announce the 'whistle' signs as text. They seem quite important to me as well.

Also, anyone know what engine that could be? Obviously, the camera and mic was mounted on the front of the loco, and on return on its back - the engine sound is much less audible than on the way to Pickering. A tank engine perhaps?

So, let's go at full steam! (Also for diesels and electrics and turbine-powered and other rail vehicles). All aboard! :)
«13456710

Comments

  • I was not convinced that the driver whistled appropriately at the first whistle sign! Or maybe I only saw the sign after the driver had already whistled.

    Thanks for starting the thread!
  • [quote="Wesley J
    Also, anyone know what engine that could be? [/quote]

    Following up the information given with the YouTube video this appears to be the locomotive in question: https://www.nymr.co.uk/lms-5mt-black-5-4-6-0-no-45428-eric-treacy
  • The Bishop who collapsed and died on Appleby station, waiting for "Evening Star".
  • Wesley JWesley J Circus Host
    Ah yes - thanks, Ex_Organist! :)

    It appears there is someone who posted all the engines and carriages found along the route!

    This would be a thing on my to-do list, doing the NYMR!
  • Baptist TrainfanBaptist Trainfan Shipmate
    edited January 2022
    Went to the NYMR years ago, couldn't park at Pickering so got on at Levisham instead - which was rather nice actually! At that time they didn't go to Whitby. Have folks seen the Channel 5 programmes on the railway? Still available for free (with quite a few other railway programmes) on My5.
  • According to the comments on the video there was also a banking locomotive: http://ukrailways1970tilltoday.me.uk/nymr_6619_2006.htm

    This one is no longer operating on that railway.
  • MontyMonty Shipmate
    I was a train spotter in the early 70’s. Lots of great memories of half term holidays spent roaming around the East Midlands with a Rail Rover ticket, trying to blag our way into sheds.

    Had many good holidays staying at a nice b&b in Grosmont and spending the day riding between Whitby and Pickering on the NYMR whilst Mrs. Monty stayed back and read.

    Does anyone remember Dalescroft Railfans, who used to organise bus tours to sheds?
  • There were any number of railway societies which organised tours of railway installations, special trains etc.; especially in the 50s and 60s as steam disappeared, and the system contracted.

    Two of the biggest are the Stephenson Locomotive Society and the Railway Correspondence & Travel Society, both of which are still very much alive and well.
  • Wesley JWesley J Circus Host
    edited January 2022
    According to the comments on the video there was also a banking locomotive: http://ukrailways1970tilltoday.me.uk/nymr_6619_2006.htm

    This one is no longer operating on that railway.

    Hm... to be frank, I'm not quite sure how to interpret the comment on GWR 56xx 6619 on the YouTube link. Was that engine at the back of the train, and the train then just reversing in Pickering with the GWR 56xx 6619 now at the front? Or did the the LMS Black 5 4-6-0 45428 'Eric Treacy', which apparently was the leading loco, reverse in Pickering and drive back, tender first, again at the front?

    The sound on the return trip seems much more muffled, so a tender-first LMS Black 5 4-6-0 45428 or the GWR 56xx 6619 backwards appears to be a reasonable conclusion.

    How do you all see it? Is there a turntable in Pickering? (Could probably check in the video, couldn't I...!)

    Embarrassinlgy, I just realise only now (!) that the video is actually from 2011, so you will be right with the fact that she's no longer with the NYMR in 2020 or 2021.

    Last remark for now: I was a bit surprised at the amount of loco wheelslip at the start. Perhaps a learner driver too? The train can't have been that long or heavy, especially when they had the tank engine/banker at the back.

    Any thoughts? (This is VERY nerdish, all this...!)
  • TelfordTelford Deckhand, Styx
    We went from Pickering to Grosmont and back about 20 years ago. I enjoyed it but I thought that the seating was rather hard
  • If you travelled in one of the ubiquitous ex-British Railways Mk 1 (1950s) coaches (found on most *heritage* lines), I'm not surprised. A nice ex-Southern Railway coach designed by Mr Maunsell or Mr Bulleid would be much more comfortable. Happily. some have been preserved and restored, and are in use on various railways.

    Local trains in Belgium in the 1970s still sometimes had coaches with varnished wooden seats - OK for short journeys, and, I guess, easy to keep clean!
  • But what of those in favour of the Diesel horse? Dieselization started earlier in North America and were not themselves associated with branch abandonments.

    The colourful paint schemes of early diesels are quite attractive.

    In good news, the Lakeshore Line in around Toronto, Ontario US going to be electrified.
  • Wesley JWesley J Circus Host
    But what of those in favour of the Diesel horse? [...] In good news, the Lakeshore Line in around Toronto, Ontario US going to be electrified.

    All modes of propulsion are most welcome, see below. - And what you're saying is good news! :)
    Wesley J wrote: »
    [...] So, let's go at full steam! (Also for diesels and electrics and turbine-powered and other rail vehicles). All aboard! :)
  • I somehow ended up watching this video (in Russian with English subtitles) about the development of a class of diesels during the Soviet era. I was impressed that the earliest ones had air conditioning. But felt they were quite lacking in seating capacity and acceleration (6 minutes to reach maximum speed!).

    I can’t explain why I find it fascinating to watch a video explaining tiny details about a train I will never ride in a language I don’t speak. But there it is.
  • Wesley JWesley J Circus Host
    edited January 2022
    Apparently, one of the precursors of that DMU (diesel multiple unit) was transformed from a 1 metre-gauge car set, originally built for Argentina, but not delivered due to WW2, to the Russian broad gauge! Now that's quite a step to have those tiny trains run on Russian lines!
  • Yes I found that fascinating! You’d think the passengers would have quite a big jump to the platform!
  • Sorry to double post (and for a lack of mechanical knowledge) but I just learned that the D1 train has automatic gear changes but second gear was mechanical so the train can be “pull started” in second gear. So if only one of the starters works, you can start the engine at the other end with a pull start. Or if neither starter works, it has been known in Moldova and elsewhere for the passengers to get out and push start the train!
  • Internal-combustion railcars, even more than locomotives, have a long and interesting history, much early work being carried out in Germany and France.

    The first diesel railcars in these islands ran on the 3' gauge County Donegal Railways in Ireland just over 90 years ago, in 1931.
  • Interestingly enough, they were single-ended and had to be turned after each journey.

    Talking of various modes of traction, what about the Spurn Head railway? https://tinyurl.com/263ee4mz
  • Wesley JWesley J Circus Host
    Interestingly enough, they were single-ended and had to be turned after each journey.

    Talking of various modes of traction, what about the Spurn Head railway? https://tinyurl.com/263ee4mz

    From Wikipedia:
    Local people who lived on the point used windpower to 'sail' small home made bogie wagons up and down the railway, with some notable crashes off the rails and into trains coming the other way.
  • There's also Gravity (obviously only in one direction!) - I have (legally) gravitated between Moelwyn Tunnel South and Tan-y-Bwlch on the Ffestiniog Railway. Only two wagons so not quite the "real thing" as per https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5xzUsNbZ-g - although in Ye Olden Days there were only 3 or 4 brakemen who jumped dangerously from wagon to wagon to keep things under control.
  • EnochEnoch Shipmate
    Lynton and Lynmouth in North Devon are connected by railway powered by the weight of water. The cars have water tanks underneath them. The weight of the car + passengers + water in the descending car pulls up the ascending one.

    On railcars, Didcot has a rebuilt steam one. The 'engine' part is enclosed in the carriage, but, before my memory, Horwich in Lancashire had one where the engine part looked like a little engine. It lasted, I think, until about 1950.

  • There were various types of steam railcar, though the Great Western ones (mostly enclosed, as @Enoch describes) seem to have been the most successful.

    We had some in Kent (before my time!), but they weren't popular - uncomfortable for passengers and crew, not very good at climbing any sort of gradient, and hard to keep clean - they had to live in the smoky, dusty confines of a steam locomotive shed. The Southern Railway separated the little engines from the coaches, and converted the latter to ordinary carriages for push-pull use, in which form they lasted until the 1960s. Now those I do remember... :flushed:
    Interestingly enough, they were single-ended and had to be turned after each journey.

    Yes, but there were turntables at all the major stations, anyway, so it wasn't really a problem. Most railcars in France, Germany, and elsewhere, were double-ended (and some, in Germany at least, were powerful enough to haul some goods wagons, too, saving the railway the cost of a separate locomotive for freight traffic).

  • SpikeSpike Ecclesiantics & MW Host, Admin Emeritus
    Has anyone been on the “new” rolling stock on the Isle of Wight yet? They recently retired the old 1938 London Underground stock and the last time I rode on one in September 2020 it was very much on its last legs (wheels?). These have now been replaced with refurbished 1980 District Line stock.

    I understand they had to lower the track bed in the tunnel at Ryde so the new trains would fit, which was the reason for using old tube trains in the first place.
  • If you travelled in one of the ubiquitous ex-British Railways Mk 1 (1950s) coaches (found on most *heritage* lines), I'm not surprised. A nice ex-Southern Railway coach designed by Mr Maunsell or Mr Bulleid would be much more comfortable. Happily. some have been preserved and restored, and are in use on various railways.

    Quite so. The BR Mk 1s probably only continue to exist because they were cheap and plentiful for a while, with too many of them available at the same time for the scrappers to deal with when they had the chance. Having experienced their bench seats, temperamental heating and crude ventilation far too many times for the full length of the ECML on their wretched original bogies before continuous welded rail was common, I would be perfectly happy to see every last one of them vanish from the face of the Earth without trace. I don't like them.
  • Spike wrote: »
    Has anyone been on the “new” rolling stock on the Isle of Wight yet? They recently retired the old 1938 London Underground stock and the last time I rode on one in September 2020 it was very much on its last legs (wheels?). These have now been replaced with refurbished 1980 District Line stock.

    I understand they had to lower the track bed in the tunnel at Ryde so the new trains would fit, which was the reason for using old tube trains in the first place.

    For the same reason (presumably), some stations have had their platform surfaces raised a few inches. The *new* trains look quite smart, though - far better than that horrid LT aluminium finish.

    I now feel Very Old, as the last time I travelled on a train on the Island was in 1964, from Ryde to Cowes, steam-hauled, of course...
  • Question: how do you 'sound out' GWR classes such as 56xx? Is it 'fifty-six ecks ecks' or 'fifty-six hundred' or something else?
  • Not being a particular fan of the Great Way Round, I couldn't say for certain, but I tend to think *fifty-six hundred* etc.
    :innocent:
  • Ricardus wrote: »
    Question: how do you 'sound out' GWR classes such as 56xx? Is it 'fifty-six ecks ecks' or 'fifty-six hundred' or something else?

    I say it “ecks ecks”.
  • Well, I suspect both are equally acceptable!
    :wink:
  • Neither works for the "Castle" class as the numbers followed on from the "Stars" - they are therefore the "4073 class" (and later ones were 50xx and 70xx but not 60xx which were the "Kings").
  • Best not to talk about those weedy little 4-6-0s at all, then...

    I'll get me grease-top and me overalls.
  • No, let's have a nice LNWR "Claughton" (in backberry black, of course). https://tinyurl.com/bp9mbzpe
  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited January 2022
    Hmm. OK, but the Proper Colour for an engine is malachite green, with sunshine lettering. Mr Bulleid said so (I think).

    So there.
    :tongue:
  • Gee DGee D Shipmate
    IIRC, the earliest diesel railcars in NSW were the CPH class, introduced in 1922 or 1923. Eventually, these were replaced by the 600(motored)/700(trailer) series, and various others followed.

    The most interesting trainset is one of the 600/700 series modified to solar power and operating at Byron Bay on the NSW far north coast
  • That’s a nice little ride but too short unfortunately. Only a few kilometres of the line between Casino and Murwillumbah remains ( between Byron Bay and North Beach stations). It goes through a beautiful bush corridor.

    The 600-700 series used to run between Sydney and Canberra for many years. It was usually 2 cars and when it reached Queanbeyan one carriage was uncoupled and went the last few miles to Canberra ( a short branch line which was opened to transport the building materials for Old Parliament House) and the other went down to Cooma ( 60 miles) then to Bombala near the border with Victoria.
  • Indeed @Gee D , the CPH class celebrates its centenary in December 2023. There are already plans being developed for a mass gathering of the remaining operational vehicles. The class leader CPH1, along with 3 and 7 is based at the railmotor museum here in the Valley.
    I am a director of another local railway museum, which operates industrial and mining locomotives hauling ex-government railways passenger carriages, as well as a demonstration train of non-air-braked wooden coal wagons. Our museum site is a former major colliery, and we operate over a short line awaiting restoration of a fire-damaged main line to a neighbouring colliery site.
    We currently have an 0-4-0 saddle tank and 0-4-0 diesel railtractor operational. We have a sister saddle tank under restoration and a 2-8-2 tank dismantled and up on stands awaiting further funding for restoration.
    We are still recovering from the bushfire disaster in 2017, but have just received a grant to replace timber bridge piers with concrete, so look forward to extending our operations again once the bridge is restored.
  • Gee DGee D Shipmate
    edited January 2022
    Barnabas_Aus: That sounds a great operation, but a huge undertaking to get those locos back in operation.

    Way back in the early 50's, I was sent by train to spend time with a great-aunt and -uncle at Rylestone. I went by train, and was disappointed to have a steam loco with dog-box carriages from either Lithgow or Wallerawang (can't remember now). Most of the passengers were workmen on their way home from Lithgow, Wallerawang or Kandos. The property where I was staying was right by the train line and so I'd spend much of the day running up to the fence to see trains passing. On the way back, the train was a rail motor to Lithgow, and I was able to sit at the front with a view out a front window. From memory, the drivers cabin was very narrow to allow for this and also for inter-unit access for longer trains.
  • OK, but the Proper Colour for an engine is malachite green, with sunshine lettering.

    No love for Stroudley's "Improved Engine Green"*?

    .

    *= yellow
  • OK, but the Proper Colour for an engine is malachite green, with sunshine lettering.

    No love for Stroudley's "Improved Engine Green"*?

    .

    *= yellow

    No. Hideous colour. Was Outrage.
    :naughty:
  • OK, but the Proper Colour for an engine is malachite green, with sunshine lettering.

    No love for Stroudley's "Improved Engine Green"*?

    .

    *= yellow

    No. Hideous colour. Was Outrage.
    :naughty:

    My Dear Sir - you place your immortal soul in peril on account of that! Certain of those who venerate the Highland Railway in Stroudley's time, not to mention the Brighton, are even now contemplating a Hell call.
  • OK, but the Proper Colour for an engine is malachite green, with sunshine lettering.

    No love for Stroudley's "Improved Engine Green"*?

    .

    *= yellow

    No. Hideous colour. Was Outrage.
    :naughty:

    My Dear Sir - you place your immortal soul in peril on account of that! Certain of those who venerate the Highland Railway in Stroudley's time, not to mention the Brighton, are even now contemplating a Hell call.

    Don't care. Anyway, the Highland Railway went all sensible with a nice green (unlined) - much easier to clean...
    :innocent:
  • Spike wrote: »
    Has anyone been on the “new” rolling stock on the Isle of Wight yet? They recently retired the old 1938 London Underground stock and the last time I rode on one in September 2020 it was very much on its last legs (wheels?). These have now been replaced with refurbished 1980 District Line stock.

    I understand they had to lower the track bed in the tunnel at Ryde so the new trains would fit, which was the reason for using old tube trains in the first place.

    A late comment - but I wonder why they didn't use ex-deep tube stock (Northern, Bakerloo etc) since if 1938 would fit, so would that? District (and other 'surface') trains are bigger. Maybe none were available, maybe there was public pressure for more headroom?

    I enjoyed your comments here regarding gravity on the Ffestiniog. Me and my kids liked taking our bikes half way up (Tan-y-bwlch?) and then cycling back downhill through the woods - they were really quite small when I started taking them. There's a place half-way down where you can sit and wait for trains to go by in a little cutting, right up close. The footpath you have to take is signposted to 'llwybr cyhoeddus'. I couldn't find it on the map :smile:

    (That's a joke for welsh speakers. If I follow ship protocol for things not in English and provide a translation, I'll spoil it).
  • Spike wrote: »
    Has anyone been on the “new” rolling stock on the Isle of Wight yet? They recently retired the old 1938 London Underground stock and the last time I rode on one in September 2020 it was very much on its last legs (wheels?). These have now been replaced with refurbished 1980 District Line stock.

    I understand they had to lower the track bed in the tunnel at Ryde so the new trains would fit, which was the reason for using old tube trains in the first place.

    A late comment - but I wonder why they didn't use ex-deep tube stock (Northern, Bakerloo etc) since if 1938 would fit, so would that? District (and other 'surface') trains are bigger. Maybe none were available, maybe there was public pressure for more headroom?

    No tube stock was available, but also the D Stock fits perfectly well (OK, well enough) into Ryde tunnel without lowering the trackbed.

    The biggest problem with Ryde tunnel was, and is, its curvature rather than its headroom. Only Underground stock has coaches short enough to get round while keeping both front and back within the curved profile of the tunnel roof.
  • the Highland Railway went all sensible with a nice green (unlined) - much easier to clean...
    No, no - it was The Highland Railway. complete with capital letters and full stop.

  • The footpath you have to take is signposted to 'llwybr cyhoeddus'. I couldn't find it on the map :smile:
    That reminds me of first living in Portugal and seeing buses allegedly going to "Desdobramento". (It means "duplicate" or "relife" service).

  • the Highland Railway went all sensible with a nice green (unlined) - much easier to clean...
    No, no - it was The Highland Railway. complete with capital letters and full stop.

    I. Stand. Corrected.

    You are quite right, of course, and I like the way the Company spread its name right along the side of its engines' tenders or tanks. It's a railway which I find quite appealing, and I'm fortunate enough to have travelled over the main lines from Perth to Inverness, on to Wick (and Thurso), and from Dingwall to Kyle of Lochalsh. This was back in the early 70s, so no steam (blue Diseasels :grimace: ), but there was a fair amount of freight traffic, and much of the original infrastructure was still intact.
  • Spike wrote: »
    Has anyone been on the “new” rolling stock on the Isle of Wight yet? They recently retired the old 1938 London Underground stock and the last time I rode on one in September 2020 it was very much on its last legs (wheels?). These have now been replaced with refurbished 1980 District Line stock.

    I understand they had to lower the track bed in the tunnel at Ryde so the new trains would fit, which was the reason for using old tube trains in the first place.

    A late comment - but I wonder why they didn't use ex-deep tube stock (Northern, Bakerloo etc) since if 1938 would fit, so would that? District (and other 'surface') trains are bigger. Maybe none were available, maybe there was public pressure for more headroom?

    No tube stock was available, but also the D Stock fits perfectly well (OK, well enough) into Ryde tunnel without lowering the trackbed.

    The biggest problem with Ryde tunnel was, and is, its curvature rather than its headroom. Only Underground stock has coaches short enough to get round while keeping both front and back within the curved profile of the tunnel roof.

    The coaches used in steam days (pre-1967) were of normal height, of course, but AIUI the Southern Railway (post-1923) had to make sure that it sent across shortish bogie rolling-stock capable of negotiating tight clearances - some ex-South Eastern & Chatham coaches, for example, were too long. Presumably, the tunnel at Ryde was one of those tight spots!
  • Wasn't the trackbed in the tunnel raised slightly after steam ended to alleviate the risk of flooding?
  • edited January 2022
    Wasn't the trackbed in the tunnel raised slightly after steam ended to alleviate the risk of flooding?

    Yes, about 25cm I think. Although even after that change it's still noticeably below sea level.
Sign In or Register to comment.