Do You pray for the dead?

Gramps49 wrote: »
This is very tragic news. Four family members of Darren Bailey, a Republican candidate for governor of Illinois in the 2026 election, have died in a helicopter crash in Montana. Bailey’s son, Zachary, his wife, Kelsey, and their two young children, Vada Rose, 12, and Samuel, 7, died in the crash. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/23/darren-bailey-illinois-crash-helicopter-00619907

We do need to keep the family in our thoughts and prayers.

@ChastMastr replied:

🕯 and for the deceased as well.

This exchange brings up something that has been on my mind for a while; namely, should Christians pray for the dead, specifically do you pray for the dead? Would love to hear the theological reasoning behind it.

Don't know about the Orthodox traditions, so I will let @Gamma Gamaliel or others explain that.

The Roman Church appears to have prayers for the dead tied to the doctrine of purgatory.

Lutherans will commend the dead to God's care, but I do not think it goes beyond that.

More evangelical denominations pan the idea it seems.

Note to @ChastMastr when I mentioned praying for the family, I left the door open for prayers for the deceased since they are a part of the larger family, in my mind.

Comments

  • I do pray for the dead, as I believe we continue to grow in Christ, just as I believe my loved ones continue to pray for me.
  • Yes, absolutely. Praying for the dead isn’t completely related to Purgatory (not that only RCs believe in Purgatory, of course)—one can pray for the dead to continue growing in grace, whether in a purgatorial state or not. Prayers for the dead within Christianity go back to the early Church, which is honestly good enough reason for me, but it makes basic sense to me as well.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prayer_for_the_dead

  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    I tend to pray for those who have died when I hear about it, but I don't tend to keep doing it, if you see what I mean.
  • No. I pray for the living, and that is enough for me.

    The dead are in Gods hands.
  • I have been to a funeral today.
    I see funerals as being for the living.
    I find Rohr's view that the function of prayer is to change yourself makes sense.
    So praying for the dead allows one to reflect on how your memory and understanding of that person's life can help you grow in your and your community's life.
  • I had the book 'For All The Saints?' on my desk, so just quoting from that:

    "True prayer is an outflowing of love; if I love someone, I will want to pray for them, not necessarily because they are in difficulties, not necessarily because there is a particular need of which I'm aware, but simply because holding them up in God's presence is the most natural and appropriate thing to do, and because I believe that God chooses to work through our prayers for other people's benefit, whatever sort of benefit that may be. Now love doesn't stop at death – or, if does, it's a pretty poor sort of love!"

    And more specifically on why Protestant theologians have traditionally frowned on the practice:

    "Once you get rid of the abuses which have pulled prayer out of shape, there is no reason why prayer should stop just because the person you are praying for happens now to be 'with Christ, which is far better'. Why not simply celebrate the fact?"
  • Gramps49 wrote: »
    Lutherans will commend the dead to God's care, but I do not think it goes beyond that.
    No. I pray for the living, and that is enough for me.

    The dead are in Gods hands.
    These comments reflect the Reformed view.

    And I will admit I bristle a bit at the suggestion that not continuing to pray for loved ones who have died shows a “pretty poor sort of love.”

    And more specifically on why Protestant theologians have traditionally frowned on the practice:

    "Once you get rid of the abuses which have pulled prayer out of shape, there is no reason why prayer should stop just because the person you are praying for happens now to be 'with Christ, which is far better'. Why not simply celebrate the fact?"
    This raises the question, though, whether praying for the dead, as such, actually does celebrate the fact. Can that fact not be celebrated by giving thanks to God that those loved ones have been made perfect in the divine presence, and by rejoicing that we are still joined with them in the communion of saints?


  • CaissaCaissa Shipmate
    No. I do not pray for the dead. As a lapsed Anglican, tending to agnosticism, I do not pray at all at this time.
  • Nick Tamen wrote: »
    "Once you get rid of the abuses which have pulled prayer out of shape, there is no reason why prayer should stop just because the person you are praying for happens now to be 'with Christ, which is far better'. Why not simply celebrate the fact?"
    This raises the question, though, whether praying for the dead, as such, actually does celebrate the fact. Can that fact not be celebrated by giving thanks to God that those loved ones have been made perfect in the divine presence, and by rejoicing that we are still joined with them in the communion of saints?

    Isn't giving thanks for them also praying for them?
  • If there is no sense in praying for the dead, there is equally no sense in praying for the living.
    All of us ,living and dead, are indeed in God's hands.
  • Caissa wrote: »
    No. I do not pray for the dead. As a lapsed Anglican, tending to agnosticism, I do not pray at all at this time.

    Me too.

    Our Place's FatherInCharge is always exhorting his little flock to pray for the soul of someone or other, but I'm never quite sure what he thinks God will do, or what, indeed, we should be asking him to do.

    Holding someone in remembrance, and commending them into God's hands, is surely enough - but I'm afraid I have no real belief in the efficacy of intercessory prayer, anyway.
    Nick Tamen wrote: »
    "Once you get rid of the abuses which have pulled prayer out of shape, there is no reason why prayer should stop just because the person you are praying for happens now to be 'with Christ, which is far better'. Why not simply celebrate the fact?"
    This raises the question, though, whether praying for the dead, as such, actually does celebrate the fact. Can that fact not be celebrated by giving thanks to God that those loved ones have been made perfect in the divine presence, and by rejoicing that we are still joined with them in the communion of saints?

    Isn't giving thanks for them also praying for them?

    I don't see how giving thanks equates to intercessory prayer - could you unpack the idea a bit, please?

    Maybe I'm getting confused here...
  • HarryCHHarryCH Shipmate
    When I pray, among other things, I ask for God's blessing on the many good people I find around me, and I ask God to watch over the souls of those who have passed on (a growing list, no doubt soon to include me).
  • Nick Tamen wrote: »
    "Once you get rid of the abuses which have pulled prayer out of shape, there is no reason why prayer should stop just because the person you are praying for happens now to be 'with Christ, which is far better'. Why not simply celebrate the fact?"
    This raises the question, though, whether praying for the dead, as such, actually does celebrate the fact. Can that fact not be celebrated by giving thanks to God that those loved ones have been made perfect in the divine presence, and by rejoicing that we are still joined with them in the communion of saints?

    Isn't giving thanks for them also praying for them?
    I wouldn’t say so, no. Praying “for” them suggests to me you are asking God to do something for them or to them—heal them, protect them, help them grow, etc. it’s intercessory prayer, as @Bishops Finger says.

    Asking you to help my friend with something he needs is not the same thing as thanking you for helping my friend with what, because of what you’ve done, he no longer needs. The focus has shifted from what my friend needs (what I asked of you “for” him) to gratitude for what you have done. Both prayers may be grounded in my love for my friend, but only the first one is a prayer “for” him and his wellbeing. In the second one, the prayer of thanks, I’d say more that I’m praying “with” him.

    Forthview wrote: »
    If there is no sense in praying for the dead, there is equally no sense in praying for the living.
    All of us ,living and dead, are indeed in God's hands.
    I’d agree with the second sentence. But I don’t think the first sentence—“If there is no sense in praying for the dead, there is equally no sense in praying for the living”—necessarily follows, because it turns on whether we believe the dead need or prayers or not. If there’s not a belief in purgatory—and in my tradition there is not—then at best, prayers for the living and prayers for the dead would seem to have very different purposes.

    Speaking personally, my style of praying for others is typically to “hold them in the light of God,” to speak metaphorically. That is to say, rather than praying for specific outcomes, I tend to pray that God will be present, will comfort and bring peace, will heal (though that healing may take different and unexpected forms, and may not include physical healing), and will, well, hold them. And that they will know they’re being held.

    My belief is that my loved ones who have died are eternally bathed in the light of God. My prayers of holding them in the light of God while they were living have been fulfilled. They no longer need my prayers.



  • Isn't giving thanks for them also praying for them?

    I don't see how giving thanks equates to intercessory prayer - could you unpack the idea a bit, please?

    Well, they are still the subject and topic of the prayer whether it is intercessory or not.

    I also wonder whether it's closest to praying for someone you are close to who you are no longer in contact with - which is something that's ever rarer in the modern world, but does still occur in times of war and so on.
  • NicoleMRNicoleMR Shipmate
    I don't exactly pray for the dead, but I talk to the dead all the time, particularly my brother.
  • I pray ABOUT the dead--saying thanks for them, etc. or talking with the Lord about some issue that grew out of our relationship. And sometimes I'll ask the Lord if he'd do me the favor of passing along a message for me to my sister, or what-not. (Kind of cheeky of me to ask him to be messenger boy, I know, but who else is guaranteed to be able?)

    As for praying for them, as if they were in need--I don't know enough about their situation to do this, really, but I don't think God would take offense, even if I were wrong. If he thought it necessary, he might let me know I didn't need to worry. But I wouldn't expect it to be a problem in his eyes unless I was really distressing myself over it in a major way, or spending huge amounts of time and effort, etc. on something unnecessary. Then he might intervene.

  • Isn't giving thanks for them also praying for them?

    I don't see how giving thanks equates to intercessory prayer - could you unpack the idea a bit, please?

    Well, they are still the subject and topic of the prayer whether it is intercessory or not.

    I also wonder whether it's closest to praying for someone you are close to who you are no longer in contact with - which is something that's ever rarer in the modern world, but does still occur in times of war and so on.

    Thanks. ISWYM.
  • The dead do not need our prayers and in a sense neither do the living.
    We are the ones who need to pray. It is good for us to remember before God our neighbours, be they, to our eyes' 'living' or 'dead'.
  • As for praying for them, as if they were in need--I don't know enough about their situation to do this, really, but I don't think God would take offense, even if I were wrong. If he thought it necessary, he might let me know I didn't need to worry. But I wouldn't expect it to be a problem in his eyes unless I was really distressing myself over it in a major way, or spending huge amounts of time and effort, etc. on something unnecessary. Then he might intervene.

    Yes, and it was somewhat remiss of me to omit the central quote of the passage above (which for avoidance of doubt was taken from the NT Wright book, and would have been written at a time when he was much more traditionally Reformed than perhaps he was later) which, it seems to me, express something of the sentiments you express above:
    Many years ago, the General Synod of the Church of England was debating the question of prayers for the dead. Professor Sir Norman Anderson, one of the most senior and respected laymen in the church of his day, and known as a leading evangelical and Protestant, rose to speak. You might have supposed that he would take the traditional line and denounce prayers for the dead as irrelevant nonsense, indicating a lack of assurance or a belief in purgatory. But Sir Norman and his wife had had three lovely children, a boy (of exceptional brilliance) and two girls; and all three had died in early adult life. And he had come, in his own experience, to realize that it was perfectly in order to continue to hold those beloved children before God in prayer, not to get them out of purgatory, nor because he was unsure about their final salvation, but because he wanted to talk to God about them, to share as it were his love for them with the God who had given them and had inexplicably allowed them to be taken away again.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    edited October 24
    @chrisstiles, I don’t have a problem at all with what N. T. Wright describes there; I just wouldn’t call it praying “for” those dead children. As Wright says, the prayers were not to get those he loved out of purgatory, and they assumed they knew salvation. To put it the way @Lamb Chopped did earlier, they were prayers “about” the children, and maybe in a sense prayers for the grieving parents themselves. But I’m afraid I just don’t see a sense in which the prayers op are “for” the children.

    But maybe I’m the one being too narrow in what I think of as being prayers for as opposed to about someone else.

    Either way, perhaps it would need to make sure we’re all on the same page about exactly what kinds of prayers we’re talking about, or we risk talking about different things.


  • Nick Tamen wrote: »
    @chrisstiles, I don’t have a problem at all with what N. T. Wright describes there; I just wouldn’t call it praying “for” those dead children. As Wright says, the prayers were not to get those he loved out of purgatory, and they assumed they knew salvation.

    But I'm not sure 'praying for' is limited to purely intercessory prayer, so much as whenever someone is the subject of the prayer which is surely the case whenever you are 'holding' someone 'before God'.

  • Nick Tamen wrote: »
    @chrisstiles, I don’t have a problem at all with what N. T. Wright describes there; I just wouldn’t call it praying “for” those dead children. As Wright says, the prayers were not to get those he loved out of purgatory, and they assumed they knew salvation.

    But I'm not sure 'praying for' is limited to purely intercessory prayer, so much as whenever someone is the subject of the prayer which is surely the case whenever you are 'holding' someone 'before God'.
    To my mind, it depends on why you are holding them before God. If you are doing it for their benefit, to gain something for them (e.g., salvation, release from purgatory, continued growth in grace), you are praying for them. But if you’re holding them before God to, in Wright’s words, “talk to God about them, to share as it were [your] love for them with the God who had given them and had inexplicably allowed them to be taken away again,” then I just don’t see that as praying for them.

    Or to put it a little differently, to my mind “praying for” is pretty much limited to intercessory prayer because in my experience people only use “praying for” when they mean “interceding on behalf of.” Calling what Wright describes “praying for the dead” is requiring “praying for” mean something different from what I, in my experience, hear people use it to mean.


  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    edited October 24
    On certain saint days--yes, Lutherans have them, especially those following high church traditions--the saint's name is mentioned in thanksgiving for the faith and life s/he/they have exemplified, but I do not think this is an intercessory prayer for the saint or to the saint.

    Of course, the Apocalypse does indicate the saints are praying for the church on earth. I am hard pressed to see how our prayers influence their prayers.
  • This topic came up recently I think.

    I will respond as I did on the previous thread. I pray for the dead because I love them.

    That doesn't mean that @Nick Tamen's love for his dear departed is any less than mine, of course.

    It makes sense to pray for the dead or to invoke the prayers of the Saints within the Orthodox paradigm. So I do so.

    If I was Reformed or some other kind of Protestant, I wouldn't.

    But I'm not, so I do.

    That's all I have to say on the matter. Nothing to do with Purgatory. Everything to do with love.
Sign In or Register to comment.