Ship of Fools: Abyssinian Baptist Church, New York City


imageShip of Fools: Abyssinian Baptist Church, New York City

‘Don’t get silly, now!’ Honor your mother every day!

Read the full Mystery Worshipper report here


Comments

  • This of course raises the question as to whether any church should cater for only one sector of the community. One can see why so many do, either consciously or unconsciously: there are historic, cultural and in some cases linguistic reasons for doing so. We all tend to relate best to people like ourselves; yet is there any sense in which churches ought to be diverse melting-pots of people? That will be hard to achieve, lead to much conflict and leave many folk feeling dissatisfied that "things aren't being done the way I'd like then to be". But is it closer to Paul's injunction of there being "neither Jew nor Greek, slave or free person" in the New Testament; would it be a wonderful model of the power of Christ's reconciling love, and would it provide a good learning experience for all of us? I don't know.
  • Neither do I, but ISTM that it's a Good Thing if a particular church (of whatever shade) reflects the demographics of the area it seeks to serve.

    It certainly is NOT possible to please all the people, all of the time...
  • Alan29Alan29 Shipmate
    Many diaspora Orthodox churches are there to serve the needs of their particular national/language/cultural communities first and foremost. It takes generations for that to change.
  • This was true in the RC Church of the "ethnic" parents of yesteryear. In my home city there were Italian, Polish and German parishes. In my Parish (Italian) there was also a Lebanese family, probably because they had no other place to go, but they were welcome and indeed quite active in parish affairs.
  • But of course there have always been "Black" churches. Don't get me wrong -- I am not saying this out of any prejudicial feelings. I am merely commenting on something that was, and still is, an historical fact.

    I don't think it was, or is, a question of feeling welcome or not feeling welcome. Whites would avoid these churches simply because they were "Black."

    Abyssinian Baptist Church was formed by Blacks who were not welcome to worship in a White church. To their credit, they have accomplished many positive things for their members over the years, and still do.

    For Whites to say now (and I confess I am guilty of this in my report) that they do not feel welcome here is, if you'll excuse the expression, the pot calling the kettle black. That is not to say that it is right -- it just **is**.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    I think there’s maybe a difference between feeling welcome and feeling like an insider, for want of a better word. If I find myself in a gathering of a family not my own, I don’t expect to feel like “one of the family”—I don’t have the shared experiences and connections. But I can still be made to feel welcome. Likewise, I don’t expect to feel like an insider when I visit another church. I would, for example, expect the sermon or prayers to relate, at least to some extent, to the life and needs of the congregation or its community. I wouldn’t expect to feel completely “included” in that, but I can still feel welcome.

    What I was curious about was what parts of the service were fast-forwarded through, and how that might have affected the report on the service. I’ll confess that this taps into some of my concerns about streamed worship, and how we participate in it. Are we really participating in worship if we can fast-forward through bits, or are we more like spectators? (And apologies if that’s more of an Ecclesiantics question.)

  • Nick Tamen wrote: »
    What I was curious about was what parts of the service were fast-forwarded through, and how that might have affected the report on the service.
    Since you asked . . . some of the music and some of the announcements.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Thanks, Miss Amanda.

  • Gee DGee D Shipmate
    Clearly, the bit about dedication as opposed to baptism is in line with general Baptist teaching. Were there any divergences from what would be found at any other Baptist church? I've had a quick look but can't find any specifically Abyssinian church of any denomination here.
  • SojournerSojourner Shipmate
    At a push, the Ethiopian Coptic Church
  • The report identifies them as being National Baptist Convention USA, whose website is instructive.
  • SojournerSojourner Shipmate
    As opposed to Southern Baptist?
  • Alan29Alan29 Shipmate
    Gee D wrote: »
    Clearly, the bit about dedication as opposed to baptism is in line with general Baptist teaching. Were there any divergences from what would be found at any other Baptist church? I've had a quick look but can't find any specifically Abyssinian church of any denomination here.

    I take the Abyssinian thing to be analogous to Rastafarian ideas about an ideal Africa.
  • The NBC have a comprehensive Statement of Faith, unlike the British Baptist Union which only has a simple "Declaration of Principle". However Wikipedia suggests that there is quite a lot of freedom for each church to determine its own faith position.

    There is one statement on the NBC website which I find intriguing and which seemingly contrasts with the position of some American (and even British) Evangelicals: "The National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc. believes that religious liberty is a gift from God. We support the freedom of the individual conscience to choose to worship God according to the dictates of one’s heart. And while we celebrate our own liberty to embrace biblical truth without compromise, we also support the first amendment to the Constitution which guarantees freedom of religion for all Americans. In this light, as Americans, we join with other faith communities in supporting the right of Islamic and other religious bodies to worship according to the dictates and mandates of their faith expression".
  • Sojourner wrote: »
    As opposed to Southern Baptist?

    Yes, Southern Baptist Convention is a different animal altogether. There is also American Baptist Churches USA and Free Will Baptist, and perhaps others I'm not aware of.
  • SojournerSojourner Shipmate
    Thank you. Apart from a few Strict and Particulars ( who are much fewer than I recall from 50 years ago) it is pretty much the Baptist Union of Australia ( with sub-unions in the individual states)
  • Gee DGee D Shipmate
    edited May 2021
    Sojourner wrote: »
    At a push, the Ethiopian Coptic Church

    Yes, there are those, but none in our part of the world. They seem to be clustered in the western and south-western suburbs There is the Coptic Diocese, which made a major contribution a couple of years ago to an ecumenical activity. I think that's primarily aimed at those from Egypt.
  • There is an Ethiopian Orthodox Church here in Phoenix -- don't know if it's the same as the Ethiopian Coptic Church. Also, the Coptic Orthodox Church can be found throughout the United States -- there's one here in Phoenix also.
  • DooneDoone Shipmate
    The NBC have a comprehensive Statement of Faith, unlike the British Baptist Union which only has a simple "Declaration of Principle". However Wikipedia suggests that there is quite a lot of freedom for each church to determine its own faith position.

    There is one statement on the NBC website which I find intriguing and which seemingly contrasts with the position of some American (and even British) Evangelicals: "The National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc. believes that religious liberty is a gift from God. We support the freedom of the individual conscience to choose to worship God according to the dictates of one’s heart. And while we celebrate our own liberty to embrace biblical truth without compromise, we also support the first amendment to the Constitution which guarantees freedom of religion for all Americans. In this light, as Americans, we join with other faith communities in supporting the right of Islamic and other religious bodies to worship according to the dictates and mandates of their faith expression".

    That is intriguing and, I suspect, very unusual. I’d certainly like to be in a position to explore it in person, but a bit tricky living on a different Continent!
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Sojourner wrote: »
    As opposed to Southern Baptist?
    Sojourner wrote: »
    As opposed to Southern Baptist?

    Yes, Southern Baptist Convention is a different animal altogether. There is also American Baptist Churches USA and Free Will Baptist, and perhaps others I'm not aware of.
    The closer counter-part to the Southern Baptist Convention is the American Baptist Churches USA, which was formerly known as the Northern Baptist Convention and then as the American Baptist Convention. The predecessor of the Northern Baptist Convention, the Triennial Convention, is the body the churches that would form the Southern Baptist Convention broke away from in 1845.

    Then there’s the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship—moderates who left

    The National Baptist Convention is a historically and predominantly African American denomination formed through the mergers of various earlier bodies in the late 1800s.


  • Gee DGee D Shipmate
    Well, Miss Amanda, these posts show very clearly the value in keeping the Mystery Worshipper going - exchanges of bits of information that have no other board to spread them.
  • You'll get no argument from Miss Amanda. :smile:
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    edited May 2021
    Indeed!

    And I’ve realized that I failed to complete a sentence. Not sure how that happened as I’m sure I remember typing out the rest of the sentence, but oh well. The penultimate sentence of my post above should have been:

    Then there’s the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship—moderates who left the Southern Baptist Convention when it took a decidedly conservative, and the moderates would say “un-Baptist,” turn in the 1980s.

  • I admit to being a bit disappointed when I read the Report that the service didn't include some of the more exotic aspects of worship and liturgy that one sometimes associates with churches in NE Africa...

    Interesting variety of Baptist churches in the US, though. In my native county of Kent in SE England, the Baptists were extraordinarily fissiparous during the great expansion of non-conformity in the 19th C.

    Literally hundreds of chapels sprang up, with pastors who left other chapels because their pastors were *preaching a different Gospel*. Often, the *new* chapel would be in the same street, or village, as the original, but few chapels of either type now remain.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    I admit to being a bit disappointed when I read the Report that the service didn't include some of the more exotic aspects of worship and liturgy that one sometimes associates with churches in NE Africa...
    The name of the church doesn’t necessarily signify a specific Ethiopian connection, but rather a broader African one. From the church’s website:
    1808: A group of African Americans (12 women and 4 men) who refused to accept segregated seating in the First Baptist Church of New York City formed The Abyssinian Baptist Church in lower Manhattan. The church name was inspired by the ancient name of Ethiopia, Abyssinia.
    That said, according to the Wiki, those who withdrew from First Baptist Church to form Abyssinian Baptist included “visiting free Ethiopian seamen and allied African-American parishioners.”

  • Thinking of what @Bishops Finger says, I remember a Baptist colleague in London, originally from Sierra Leone, who asserted that the huge variety of Afro-Caribbean churches in Britain was very often due to leaders splitting from existing congregations and setting up new ones. (This was about 25 years ago).
Sign In or Register to comment.