Keryg 2022: The parable of the Good Samaritan

2»

Comments

  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    Looking at the story a bit, one reason why the priest and the scribe would avoid the man left for dead would be, besides becoming ritually unclean, the great danger they would have placed themselves in. Could the thieves still be around? Not so unusual to leave a person for dead as bait for another attack. The priest and scribe probably had more money on them than the man they had attacked.

    However, the Samaritan doesn't seem so concerned about his own safety. He is willing to put everything at risk to help the man at the side of the road. I get the impression he was wealthy enough to have paid for the man's keep at the end, and the innkeeper seems to know his word is as good as gold.
  • GalilitGalilit Shipmate
    I'd have thought it would have fallen into the category of
    פיקוח נפש
    "pikuach nefesh"
    ie where Ordinary Rules and Restrictions are suspended by the seriousness of the situation
  • SpikeSpike Ecclesiantics & MW Host, Admin Emeritus
    The man was very foolish to be on that road alone. It was notorious for bandits and people were discouraged from going along there on their own, so it could be said that he got himself into that predicament.

    Even though it was his own fault, the Samaritan still took it upon himself to help the man. This is an indication that everyone deserves help or sympathy, however they got into a particular situation.
  • KarlLBKarlLB Shipmate
    Spike wrote: »
    The man was very foolish to be on that road alone. It was notorious for bandits and people were discouraged from going along there on their own, so it could be said that he got himself into that predicament.

    Even though it was his own fault, the Samaritan still took it upon himself to help the man. This is an indication that everyone deserves help or sympathy, however they got into a particular situation.

    Surprised no-one has picked up on this. I think it's an excellent observation and a challenging one at that.
  • Spike wrote: »
    The man was very foolish to be on that road alone. It was notorious for bandits and people were discouraged from going along there on their own, so it could be said that he got himself into that predicament.

    Even though it was his own fault, the Samaritan still took it upon himself to help the man. This is an indication that everyone deserves help or sympathy, however they got into a particular situation.

    This is a story created to make a particular point in response to the question. So we are not told the reason why the dangerous journey was being made. For the purpose of the story it is not important. The other travellers were making the same dangerous journey.

    You are correct about everyone should be helped, regardless. From the story we can also conclude that the common temptation to blame the victim is wrong.
  • BroJamesBroJames Purgatory Host
    (Although none of the people passing him on the road were in any position to do that since they were making the same journey.)
  • BroJames wrote: »
    (Although none of the people passing him on the road were in any position to do that since they were making the same journey.)

    They were not the intended audience of the story for the writer of the Luke's Gospel.
Sign In or Register to comment.