The Labour Government - 2025

1272829303133»

Comments

  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    I think he actually believes there is such a thing as international law and that countries ought to obey it, which is something.

    If he does believe that he also believes there are exceptions.
  • HugalHugal Shipmate
    Burnham has criticised both Margaret Thatcher and Brexit. I like it. Brave move though. Apparently polls agree with him.
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    That's a pretty low bar.
  • Hugal wrote: »
    Burnham has criticised both Margaret Thatcher and Brexit.

    He said he wanted to 'reverse Thatcher's legacy', but so far all the noises from Healey indicate business as usual.

    Also he's going to have to do a lot better than Starmer in reacting to masked fascists on the streets.
  • LouiseLouise Epiphanies Host
    And no sign of that so far. It's not hard to imagine how today's fascist rally blocking a port would have been treated if the cause was climate disaster or Palestine. It’s very frustrating.
  • sionisaissionisais Shipmate
    edited September 5
    Am I the only person to note that the thugs in black at Dover are just those who spend a lot of time complaining about people dressed in black?
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    As someone pointed out on bsky, Just Stop Oil protesters got five years in jail for merely *planning* to do this to the M25.
  • Pomona wrote: »
    As someone pointed out on bsky, Just Stop Oil protesters got five years in jail for merely *planning* to do this to the M25.

    Dressed in black with a balaclava definitely has a political terrorist look.

  • Alan29Alan29 Shipmate
    sionisais wrote: »
    Am I the only person to note that the thugs in black at Dover are just those who spend a lot of time complaining about people dressed in black?

    Got to love a bloke in a hijab.
  • Fascist look, isn't it?
  • KarlLBKarlLB Shipmate
    Pomona wrote: »
    As someone pointed out on bsky, Just Stop Oil protesters got five years in jail for merely *planning* to do this to the M25.

    And I recall the Right banging on about how trucks should just run them over and the police wash them away with water cannon.
  • Pomona wrote: »
    As someone pointed out on bsky, Just Stop Oil protesters got five years in jail for merely *planning* to do this to the M25.

    Kent police described it as a 'spontaneous protest'. Presumably they all "spontaneously" took the train down to Dover wearing black and carrying balaclavas.

    BBC coverage was predictably terrible describing it as a protest (no quotes), and using passive cop tense ("This photo appears to show .." etc).
  • David Allen Green has an article in Prospect that hints at how these situations have come about due to a skewing of political priorities:

    https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/law/the-weekly-constitutional/74703/holding-a-placard-is-terrorism-disruption-in-balaclava-is-not

    As he says:
    But the very fact these private armies have developed while ministers and the police have been criminalising peaceful protesters under terrorism laws indicates warped political and operational priorities. Anti-terrorism is topsy-turvy because ministers and the police prefer easy targets under sweeping laws which seem even to confuse judges.

    Terrorism law is the special body of law which gives the state extra powers beyond the general law of the land. It should be used sparingly and with deliberation. Indeed, such laws used only to be enacted on a temporary basis, even against the IRA. But now terrorism law is used casually and, as we can now see, inefficiently. And so we have the sights of mass arrests for holding up signs, and also of no arrests for those in political uniforms causing havoc.

    I think if you are going to take a classical liberal (Mill etc) view of things then this is a conclusion that is more or less forced on you.
  • Yes, pathetic isn’t it. Mass civil disobedience is, in the clear knowledge that you’re going to be kettled, kicked and arrested is probably the only option, because the government and parliament are not giving a lead.
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    And it needs pointing out how long this has been a problem for Labour, particularly given the 9/11 anniversary and how soon afterwards the UK under Blair turned towards sweeping anti-terror laws.
  • ThunderBunkThunderBunk Shipmate
    edited September 15
    Partly because of his nauseating sycophancy towards Bush jnr.

    Turns the special relationship into a pathetically bad joke.
  • Tom Watson goes to work for Palantir.
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    Tom Watson goes to work for Palantir.

    This is my shocked face at this news: :neutral:

    Piece of shit found in toilet: film at 11.
  • To think Jeremy Corbyn had Watson as deputy leader.
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    sionisais wrote: »
    To think Jeremy Corbyn had Watson as deputy leader.

    Not out of choice.
  • Yeah, it's an elected position.
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    And if I recall rightly none of the candidates were great. Watson was elected largely on the strength of his phone-hacking scandal work.
  • TurquoiseTasticTurquoiseTastic Kerygmania Host
    I am a bit confused as to ... why Palantir would want Watson working for them?
  • I am a bit confused as to ... why Palantir would want Watson working for them?

    Well, they do contracts for governments, and he himself worked at a high level in government, so...
  • Maybe they hired him for his magnetic personality and technical excellence.
  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    stetson wrote: »
    I am a bit confused as to ... why Palantir would want Watson working for them?

    Well, they do contracts for governments, and he himself worked at a high level in government, so...

    persuant...

    ...given what I take to be the SoF britpol community's generally negative view of this Watson guy, is there any reason to think an outfit like Palantir would NOT want him as an employee?

    Is it maybe a question of practical suitability, like he doesn't have the relevant skill set?
  • DoublethinkDoublethink Admin, 8th Day Host
    The original application for him to have a peerage was turned down, probably owing to his role in Operation Midland. He didn’t complete either his training as a librarian or his undergraduate degree.
Sign In or Register to comment.